NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
5 Foot Burrito, Picadillo Beef vs 3 Foot Burrito, Beef Machaca
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Acapulco Mexican Restaurant Y Cantina menu items.
Quick answer
3 Foot Burrito, Beef Machaca is lowest in calories, while 5 Foot Burrito, Picadillo Beef gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
3 Foot Burrito, Beef Machaca
1,490 kcal
Highest protein
5 Foot Burrito, Picadillo Beef
0 g protein
Lowest carbs
3 Foot Burrito, Beef Machaca
134 g carbs
Lowest sodium
3 Foot Burrito, Beef Machaca
3,170 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Foot Burrito, Picadillo BeefBurrito By The Foot | 1,800 kcal | 0 g | 156 g | 0 g | 0 g | 4,070 mg |
| 3 Foot Burrito, Beef MachacaBurrito By The Foot | 1,490 kcal | 0 g | 134 g | 0 g | 0 g | 3,170 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose 3 Foot Burrito, Beef Machaca if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 1,490 calories per serving.
Choose 5 Foot Burrito, Picadillo Beef if you want the most protein. It has 0g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, 3 Foot Burrito, Beef Machaca is the lighter sodium pick at 3,170mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Acapulco Mexican Restaurant Y Cantina calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator