NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Chile Relleno vs 3 Foot Burrito, Carnitas
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Acapulco Mexican Restaurant Y Cantina menu items.
Quick answer
Chile Relleno is the strongest overall pick here: lower calories and the most protein among these items.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Chile Relleno
410 kcal
Highest protein
Chile Relleno
0 g protein
Lowest carbs
Chile Relleno
21 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Chile Relleno
670 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chile RellenoCombos | 410 kcal | 0 g | 21 g | 0 g | 0 g | 670 mg |
| 3 Foot Burrito, CarnitasBurrito By The Foot | 1,510 kcal | 0 g | 132 g | 0 g | 0 g | 2,940 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Chile Relleno if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 410 calories per serving.
Choose Chile Relleno if you want the most protein. It has 0g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Chile Relleno is the lighter sodium pick at 670mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Acapulco Mexican Restaurant Y Cantina calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator