NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Nachos Ultimos, Picadillo Beef vs 3 Foot Burrito, Beef Machaca
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Acapulco Mexican Restaurant Y Cantina menu items.
Quick answer
3 Foot Burrito, Beef Machaca is lowest in calories, while Nachos Ultimos, Picadillo Beef gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
3 Foot Burrito, Beef Machaca
1,490 kcal
Highest protein
Nachos Ultimos, Picadillo Beef
0 g protein
Lowest carbs
3 Foot Burrito, Beef Machaca
134 g carbs
Lowest sodium
3 Foot Burrito, Beef Machaca
3,170 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nachos Ultimos, Picadillo BeefAperitivos | 2,120 kcal | 0 g | 177 g | 0 g | 0 g | 3,470 mg |
| 3 Foot Burrito, Beef MachacaBurrito By The Foot | 1,490 kcal | 0 g | 134 g | 0 g | 0 g | 3,170 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose 3 Foot Burrito, Beef Machaca if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 1,490 calories per serving.
Choose Nachos Ultimos, Picadillo Beef if you want the most protein. It has 0g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, 3 Foot Burrito, Beef Machaca is the lighter sodium pick at 3,170mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Acapulco Mexican Restaurant Y Cantina calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator