NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Soft Taco, Picadillo Beef vs 3 Foot Burrito, Beef Machaca
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Acapulco Mexican Restaurant Y Cantina menu items.
Quick answer
Soft Taco, Picadillo Beef is the strongest overall pick here: lower calories and the most protein among these items.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Soft Taco, Picadillo Beef
200 kcal
Highest protein
Soft Taco, Picadillo Beef
0 g protein
Lowest carbs
Soft Taco, Picadillo Beef
16 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Soft Taco, Picadillo Beef
740 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soft Taco, Picadillo BeefCombos | 200 kcal | 0 g | 16 g | 0 g | 0 g | 740 mg |
| 3 Foot Burrito, Beef MachacaBurrito By The Foot | 1,490 kcal | 0 g | 134 g | 0 g | 0 g | 3,170 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Soft Taco, Picadillo Beef if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 200 calories per serving.
Choose Soft Taco, Picadillo Beef if you want the most protein. It has 0g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Soft Taco, Picadillo Beef is the lighter sodium pick at 740mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Acapulco Mexican Restaurant Y Cantina calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator