NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Butterscotch Topping vs Ambrosia
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Buffets menu items.
Quick answer
Butterscotch Topping is the strongest overall pick here: lower calories and the most protein among these items.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Butterscotch Topping
130 kcal
Highest protein
Butterscotch Topping
0 g protein
Lowest carbs
Ambrosia
22 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Ambrosia
50 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Butterscotch ToppingDesserts & Dessert Toppings | 130 kcal | 0 g | 31 g | 0 g | 0 g | 105 mg |
| AmbrosiaSalads & Salad Toppings | 150 kcal | 0 g | 22 g | 8 g | 1 g | 50 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Butterscotch Topping if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 130 calories per serving.
Choose Butterscotch Topping if you want the most protein. It has 0g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Ambrosia is the lighter sodium pick at 50mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Buffets calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator