NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Chipotle Chicken & Jack, Large vs Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, Large
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Deli Delicious menu items.
Quick answer
Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, Large is lowest in calories, while Chipotle Chicken & Jack, Large gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, Large
1,770 kcal
Highest protein
Chipotle Chicken & Jack, Large
100 g protein
Lowest carbs
Chipotle Chicken & Jack, Large
151 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, Large
2,680 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipotle Chicken & Jack, LargeHot Sandwiches | 1,780 kcal | 100 g | 151 g | 88 g | 23 g | 3,320 mg |
| Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, LargeSpecialty Sandwiches | 1,770 kcal | 79 g | 151 g | 101 g | 23 g | 2,680 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, Large if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 1,770 calories per serving.
Choose Chipotle Chicken & Jack, Large if you want the most protein. It has 100g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, Large is the lighter sodium pick at 2,680mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Deli Delicious calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator