NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Path to Tibet vs Antioxidant Mix
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Go Bites menu items.
Quick answer
Antioxidant Mix is lowest in calories, while Path to Tibet gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Antioxidant Mix
183 kcal
Highest protein
Path to Tibet
7.8 g protein
Lowest carbs
Path to Tibet
23.2 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Path to Tibet
9.9 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Path to TibetSnack | 227 kcal | 7.8 g | 23.2 g | 12.9 g | 5.4 g | 10 mg |
| Antioxidant MixSnack | 183 kcal | 4.8 g | 24.3 g | 7.4 g | 2.1 g | 44 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Antioxidant Mix if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 183 calories per serving.
Choose Path to Tibet if you want the most protein. It has 7.8g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Path to Tibet is the lighter sodium pick at 10mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Go Bites calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator