NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Stone Ruination Double IPA 2.0, 22 oz vs Ale Smith .394, 16 oz
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Islands Fine Burgers & Drinks menu items.
Quick answer
Ale Smith .394, 16 oz is lowest in calories, while Stone Ruination Double IPA 2.0, 22 oz gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Ale Smith .394, 16 oz
250 kcal
Highest protein
Stone Ruination Double IPA 2.0, 22 oz
5.1 g protein
Lowest carbs
Ale Smith .394, 16 oz
27 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Stone Ruination Double IPA 2.0, 22 oz
45 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stone Ruination Double IPA 2.0, 22 ozDraft Beer | 470 kcal | 5.1 g | 50 g | 0 g | 0 g | 45 mg |
| Ale Smith .394, 16 ozDraft Beer | 250 kcal | 2.5 g | 27 g | 0 g | 0 g | 65 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Ale Smith .394, 16 oz if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 250 calories per serving.
Choose Stone Ruination Double IPA 2.0, 22 oz if you want the most protein. It has 5.1g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Stone Ruination Double IPA 2.0, 22 oz is the lighter sodium pick at 45mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Islands Fine Burgers & Drinks calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator