Nutrition comparison

Stone Ruination Double IPA 2.0, 22 oz vs Ale Smith .394, 16 oz

Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Islands Fine Burgers & Drinks menu items.

Quick answer

Ale Smith .394, 16 oz is lowest in calories, while Stone Ruination Double IPA 2.0, 22 oz gives the most protein.

Add all to calculator
Lowest calories
Ale Smith .394, 16 oz
250 kcal
Highest protein
Stone Ruination Double IPA 2.0, 22 oz
5.1 g protein
Lowest carbs
Ale Smith .394, 16 oz
27 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Stone Ruination Double IPA 2.0, 22 oz
45 mg sodium

Side-by-side nutrition facts

Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.

Menu itemCaloriesProteinCarbsFatFiberSodium
Stone Ruination Double IPA 2.0, 22 ozDraft Beer470 kcal5.1 g50 g0 g0 g45 mg
Ale Smith .394, 16 ozDraft Beer250 kcal2.5 g27 g0 g0 g65 mg

Which should you choose?

Choose Ale Smith .394, 16 oz if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 250 calories per serving.

Choose Stone Ruination Double IPA 2.0, 22 oz if you want the most protein. It has 5.1g protein per serving.

If sodium matters, Stone Ruination Double IPA 2.0, 22 oz is the lighter sodium pick at 45mg.

Compare as a meal

Open these items in the Islands Fine Burgers & Drinks calculator to see combined calories and macros.

Open calculator