NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Glass vs >Kendall, Jackson, California, Grande
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Johnny Carino's menu items.
Quick answer
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Glass is the strongest overall pick here: lower calories and the most protein among these items.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Glass
130 kcal
Highest protein
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Glass
0 g protein
Lowest carbs
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Glass
0 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Glass
0 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, GlassWine List | 130 kcal | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 mg |
| >Kendall, Jackson, California, GrandeWine List | 220 kcal | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Glass if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 130 calories per serving.
Choose Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Glass if you want the most protein. It has 0g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Glass is the lighter sodium pick at 0mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Johnny Carino's calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator