NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Grande vs >Kendall, Jackson, California, Grande
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Johnny Carino's menu items.
Quick answer
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Grande is the strongest overall pick here: lower calories and the most protein among these items.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Grande
210 kcal
Highest protein
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Grande
0 g protein
Lowest carbs
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Grande
0 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Grande
0 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, GrandeWine List | 210 kcal | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 mg |
| >Kendall, Jackson, California, GrandeWine List | 220 kcal | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Grande if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 210 calories per serving.
Choose Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Grande if you want the most protein. It has 0g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Chateau Ste. Michelle, Washington, Grande is the lighter sodium pick at 0mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Johnny Carino's calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator