NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Gnarly Head Zinfandel, Grande vs >Kendall, Jackson, California, Grande
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Johnny Carino's menu items.
Quick answer
>Kendall, Jackson, California, Grande is lowest in calories, while Gnarly Head Zinfandel, Grande gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
>Kendall, Jackson, California, Grande
220 kcal
Highest protein
Gnarly Head Zinfandel, Grande
0 g protein
Lowest carbs
Gnarly Head Zinfandel, Grande
0 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Gnarly Head Zinfandel, Grande
0 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gnarly Head Zinfandel, GrandeWine List | 260 kcal | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 mg |
| >Kendall, Jackson, California, GrandeWine List | 220 kcal | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose >Kendall, Jackson, California, Grande if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 220 calories per serving.
Choose Gnarly Head Zinfandel, Grande if you want the most protein. It has 0g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Gnarly Head Zinfandel, Grande is the lighter sodium pick at 0mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Johnny Carino's calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator