NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Italian Combo Nachos, Small vs >Kendall, Jackson, California, Grande
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Johnny Carino's menu items.
Quick answer
>Kendall, Jackson, California, Grande is lowest in calories, while Italian Combo Nachos, Small gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
>Kendall, Jackson, California, Grande
220 kcal
Highest protein
Italian Combo Nachos, Small
24 g protein
Lowest carbs
>Kendall, Jackson, California, Grande
0 g carbs
Lowest sodium
>Kendall, Jackson, California, Grande
0 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Italian Combo Nachos, SmallAppetizers | 461 kcal | 24 g | 46 g | 20 g | 4 g | 1,122 mg |
| >Kendall, Jackson, California, GrandeWine List | 220 kcal | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose >Kendall, Jackson, California, Grande if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 220 calories per serving.
Choose Italian Combo Nachos, Small if you want the most protein. It has 24g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, >Kendall, Jackson, California, Grande is the lighter sodium pick at 0mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Johnny Carino's calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator