NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Sutter Home White Zinfandel, California, Grande vs >Kendall, Jackson, California, Grande
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Johnny Carino's menu items.
Quick answer
Sutter Home White Zinfandel, California, Grande is the strongest overall pick here: lower calories and the most protein among these items.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Sutter Home White Zinfandel, California, Grande
216 kcal
Highest protein
Sutter Home White Zinfandel, California, Grande
0 g protein
Lowest carbs
Sutter Home White Zinfandel, California, Grande
0 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Sutter Home White Zinfandel, California, Grande
0 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sutter Home White Zinfandel, California, GrandeWine List | 216 kcal | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 mg |
| >Kendall, Jackson, California, GrandeWine List | 220 kcal | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Sutter Home White Zinfandel, California, Grande if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 216 calories per serving.
Choose Sutter Home White Zinfandel, California, Grande if you want the most protein. It has 0g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Sutter Home White Zinfandel, California, Grande is the lighter sodium pick at 0mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Johnny Carino's calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator