NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Quinoa Salad, Sides vs BabaNanoosh
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Nanoosh menu items.
Quick answer
BabaNanoosh is lowest in calories, while Quinoa Salad, Sides gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
BabaNanoosh
159 kcal
Highest protein
Quinoa Salad, Sides
6 g protein
Lowest carbs
BabaNanoosh
12 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Quinoa Salad, Sides
190 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quinoa Salad, SidesSides | 238 kcal | 6 g | 36 g | 8 g | 4 g | 190 mg |
| BabaNanooshSides | 159 kcal | 4 g | 12 g | 11 g | 2 g | 375 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose BabaNanoosh if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 159 calories per serving.
Choose Quinoa Salad, Sides if you want the most protein. It has 6g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Quinoa Salad, Sides is the lighter sodium pick at 190mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Nanoosh calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator