NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Gluten Sensitive Balsamic Salmon, No Sides vs All Star Burger, No Side
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Ninety Nine Restaurants menu items.
Quick answer
Gluten Sensitive Balsamic Salmon, No Sides is lowest in calories, while All Star Burger, No Side gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Gluten Sensitive Balsamic Salmon, No Sides
670 kcal
Highest protein
All Star Burger, No Side
56 g protein
Lowest carbs
Gluten Sensitive Balsamic Salmon, No Sides
11 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Gluten Sensitive Balsamic Salmon, No Sides
760 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gluten Sensitive Balsamic Salmon, No SidesGluten Sensitive Menu | 670 kcal | 53 g | 11 g | 47 g | 1 g | 760 mg |
| All Star Burger, No SideJuicy Burgers | 1,170 kcal | 56 g | 81 g | 68 g | 3 g | 3,170 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Gluten Sensitive Balsamic Salmon, No Sides if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 670 calories per serving.
Choose All Star Burger, No Side if you want the most protein. It has 56g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Gluten Sensitive Balsamic Salmon, No Sides is the lighter sodium pick at 760mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Ninety Nine Restaurants calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator