NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Meatball Sub, No Side vs All Star Burger, No Side
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Ninety Nine Restaurants menu items.
Quick answer
Meatball Sub, No Side is lowest in calories, while All Star Burger, No Side gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Meatball Sub, No Side
970 kcal
Highest protein
All Star Burger, No Side
56 g protein
Lowest carbs
Meatball Sub, No Side
61 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Meatball Sub, No Side
2,320 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meatball Sub, No SideSandwiches | 970 kcal | 45 g | 61 g | 62 g | 2 g | 2,320 mg |
| All Star Burger, No SideJuicy Burgers | 1,170 kcal | 56 g | 81 g | 68 g | 3 g | 3,170 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Meatball Sub, No Side if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 970 calories per serving.
Choose All Star Burger, No Side if you want the most protein. It has 56g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Meatball Sub, No Side is the lighter sodium pick at 2,320mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Ninety Nine Restaurants calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator