NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Applewood BBQ Wings, Short vs Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Old Chicago menu items.
Quick answer
Applewood BBQ Wings, Short is the strongest overall pick here: lower calories and the most protein among these items.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Applewood BBQ Wings, Short
443 kcal
Highest protein
Applewood BBQ Wings, Short
30 g protein
Lowest carbs
Applewood BBQ Wings, Short
13 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Applewood BBQ Wings, Short
338 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applewood BBQ Wings, ShortHand Tossed Wings | 443 kcal | 30 g | 13 g | 30 g | 1 g | 338 mg |
| Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, ShortHand Tossed Wings | 524 kcal | 27 g | 59 g | 18 g | 2 g | 2,175 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Applewood BBQ Wings, Short if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 443 calories per serving.
Choose Applewood BBQ Wings, Short if you want the most protein. It has 30g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Applewood BBQ Wings, Short is the lighter sodium pick at 338mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Old Chicago calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator