NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Applewood Dry Rub Boneless Wings, Tall vs Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Old Chicago menu items.
Quick answer
Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short is lowest in calories, while Applewood Dry Rub Boneless Wings, Tall gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
524 kcal
Highest protein
Applewood Dry Rub Boneless Wings, Tall
48 g protein
Lowest carbs
Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
59 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
2,175 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applewood Dry Rub Boneless Wings, TallHand Tossed Wings | 750 kcal | 48 g | 74 g | 26 g | 4 g | 3,980 mg |
| Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, ShortHand Tossed Wings | 524 kcal | 27 g | 59 g | 18 g | 2 g | 2,175 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 524 calories per serving.
Choose Applewood Dry Rub Boneless Wings, Tall if you want the most protein. It has 48g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short is the lighter sodium pick at 2,175mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Old Chicago calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator