NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Arnold Palmer vs Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Old Chicago menu items.
Quick answer
Arnold Palmer is lowest in calories, while Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Arnold Palmer
90 kcal
Highest protein
Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
27 g protein
Lowest carbs
Arnold Palmer
22 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Arnold Palmer
5 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnold PalmerBeverages | 90 kcal | 0 g | 22 g | 0 g | 1 g | 5 mg |
| Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, ShortHand Tossed Wings | 524 kcal | 27 g | 59 g | 18 g | 2 g | 2,175 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Arnold Palmer if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 90 calories per serving.
Choose Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short if you want the most protein. It has 27g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Arnold Palmer is the lighter sodium pick at 5mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Old Chicago calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator