NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Coke vs Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Old Chicago menu items.
Quick answer
Coke is lowest in calories, while Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Coke
163 kcal
Highest protein
Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
27 g protein
Lowest carbs
Coke
45 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Coke
10 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CokeBeverages | 163 kcal | 0 g | 45 g | 0 g | 0 g | 10 mg |
| Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, ShortHand Tossed Wings | 524 kcal | 27 g | 59 g | 18 g | 2 g | 2,175 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Coke if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 163 calories per serving.
Choose Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short if you want the most protein. It has 27g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Coke is the lighter sodium pick at 10mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Old Chicago calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator