NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Firehouse Wings, Short vs Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Old Chicago menu items.
Quick answer
Firehouse Wings, Short is the strongest overall pick here: lower calories and the most protein among these items.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Firehouse Wings, Short
402 kcal
Highest protein
Firehouse Wings, Short
29 g protein
Lowest carbs
Firehouse Wings, Short
2 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Firehouse Wings, Short
728 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firehouse Wings, ShortHand Tossed Wings | 402 kcal | 29 g | 2 g | 30 g | 1 g | 728 mg |
| Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, ShortHand Tossed Wings | 524 kcal | 27 g | 59 g | 18 g | 2 g | 2,175 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Firehouse Wings, Short if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 402 calories per serving.
Choose Firehouse Wings, Short if you want the most protein. It has 29g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Firehouse Wings, Short is the lighter sodium pick at 728mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Old Chicago calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator