NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Original Boneless Buffalo Wings, Short vs Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Old Chicago menu items.
Quick answer
Original Boneless Buffalo Wings, Short is the strongest overall pick here: lower calories and the most protein among these items.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Original Boneless Buffalo Wings, Short
439 kcal
Highest protein
Original Boneless Buffalo Wings, Short
27 g protein
Lowest carbs
Original Boneless Buffalo Wings, Short
38 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
2,175 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original Boneless Buffalo Wings, ShortHand Tossed Wings | 439 kcal | 27 g | 38 g | 18 g | 3 g | 3,021 mg |
| Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, ShortHand Tossed Wings | 524 kcal | 27 g | 59 g | 18 g | 2 g | 2,175 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Original Boneless Buffalo Wings, Short if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 439 calories per serving.
Choose Original Boneless Buffalo Wings, Short if you want the most protein. It has 27g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short is the lighter sodium pick at 2,175mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Old Chicago calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator