NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Original Buffalo Wings, Short vs Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Old Chicago menu items.
Quick answer
Original Buffalo Wings, Short is the strongest overall pick here: lower calories and the most protein among these items.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Original Buffalo Wings, Short
400 kcal
Highest protein
Original Buffalo Wings, Short
30 g protein
Lowest carbs
Original Buffalo Wings, Short
2 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Original Buffalo Wings, Short
761 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original Buffalo Wings, ShortHand Tossed Wings | 400 kcal | 30 g | 2 g | 30 g | 1 g | 761 mg |
| Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, ShortHand Tossed Wings | 524 kcal | 27 g | 59 g | 18 g | 2 g | 2,175 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Original Buffalo Wings, Short if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 400 calories per serving.
Choose Original Buffalo Wings, Short if you want the most protein. It has 30g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Original Buffalo Wings, Short is the lighter sodium pick at 761mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Old Chicago calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator