NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Original Buffalo Wings, Tall with Ranch Dressing vs Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Old Chicago menu items.
Quick answer
Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short is lowest in calories, while Original Buffalo Wings, Tall with Ranch Dressing gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
524 kcal
Highest protein
Original Buffalo Wings, Tall with Ranch Dressing
54 g protein
Lowest carbs
Original Buffalo Wings, Tall with Ranch Dressing
6 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Original Buffalo Wings, Tall with Ranch Dressing
1,915 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original Buffalo Wings, Tall with Ranch DressingHand Tossed Wings | 1,026 kcal | 54 g | 6 g | 85 g | 1 g | 1,915 mg |
| Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, ShortHand Tossed Wings | 524 kcal | 27 g | 59 g | 18 g | 2 g | 2,175 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 524 calories per serving.
Choose Original Buffalo Wings, Tall with Ranch Dressing if you want the most protein. It has 54g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Original Buffalo Wings, Tall with Ranch Dressing is the lighter sodium pick at 1,915mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Old Chicago calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator