NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Screaming Mango Wings, Short vs Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Old Chicago menu items.
Quick answer
Screaming Mango Wings, Short is the strongest overall pick here: lower calories and the most protein among these items.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Screaming Mango Wings, Short
420 kcal
Highest protein
Screaming Mango Wings, Short
29 g protein
Lowest carbs
Screaming Mango Wings, Short
7 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Screaming Mango Wings, Short
224 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screaming Mango Wings, ShortHand Tossed Wings | 420 kcal | 29 g | 7 g | 30 g | 0 g | 224 mg |
| Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, ShortHand Tossed Wings | 524 kcal | 27 g | 59 g | 18 g | 2 g | 2,175 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Screaming Mango Wings, Short if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 420 calories per serving.
Choose Screaming Mango Wings, Short if you want the most protein. It has 29g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Screaming Mango Wings, Short is the lighter sodium pick at 224mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Old Chicago calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator