NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Screaming Mango Wings, Short with Ranch Dressing vs Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Old Chicago menu items.
Quick answer
Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short is lowest in calories, while Screaming Mango Wings, Short with Ranch Dressing gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
524 kcal
Highest protein
Screaming Mango Wings, Short with Ranch Dressing
30 g protein
Lowest carbs
Screaming Mango Wings, Short with Ranch Dressing
9 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Screaming Mango Wings, Short with Ranch Dressing
483 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screaming Mango Wings, Short with Ranch DressingHand Tossed Wings | 604 kcal | 30 g | 9 g | 49 g | 1 g | 483 mg |
| Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, ShortHand Tossed Wings | 524 kcal | 27 g | 59 g | 18 g | 2 g | 2,175 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 524 calories per serving.
Choose Screaming Mango Wings, Short with Ranch Dressing if you want the most protein. It has 30g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Screaming Mango Wings, Short with Ranch Dressing is the lighter sodium pick at 483mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Old Chicago calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator