NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Sweet Thai Chili Wings, Tall vs Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Old Chicago menu items.
Quick answer
Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short is lowest in calories, while Sweet Thai Chili Wings, Tall gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short
524 kcal
Highest protein
Sweet Thai Chili Wings, Tall
53 g protein
Lowest carbs
Sweet Thai Chili Wings, Tall
27 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Sweet Thai Chili Wings, Tall
779 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sweet Thai Chili Wings, TallHand Tossed Wings | 807 kcal | 53 g | 27 g | 53 g | 1 g | 779 mg |
| Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, ShortHand Tossed Wings | 524 kcal | 27 g | 59 g | 18 g | 2 g | 2,175 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Applewood BBQ Boneless Wings, Short if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 524 calories per serving.
Choose Sweet Thai Chili Wings, Tall if you want the most protein. It has 53g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Sweet Thai Chili Wings, Tall is the lighter sodium pick at 779mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Old Chicago calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator