NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Boneless Wings, Old Bay vs Boneless Tenders, Atomic
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Wingstop menu items.
Quick answer
Boneless Wings, Old Bay is lowest in calories, while Boneless Tenders, Atomic gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Boneless Wings, Old Bay
100 kcal
Highest protein
Boneless Tenders, Atomic
10 g protein
Lowest carbs
Boneless Wings, Old Bay
6 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Boneless Wings, Old Bay
290 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boneless Wings, Old BayBoneless Wings | 100 kcal | 4 g | 6 g | 6 g | 0 g | 290 mg |
| Boneless Tenders, AtomicBoneless Tenders | 150 kcal | 10 g | 12 g | 7 g | 0 g | 850 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Boneless Wings, Old Bay if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 100 calories per serving.
Choose Boneless Tenders, Atomic if you want the most protein. It has 10g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Boneless Wings, Old Bay is the lighter sodium pick at 290mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Wingstop calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator