NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Classic (Bone-In) Wings, Atomic vs Boneless Tenders, Atomic
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Wingstop menu items.
Quick answer
Classic (Bone-In) Wings, Atomic is the strongest overall pick here: lower calories and the most protein among these items.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Classic (Bone-In) Wings, Atomic
90 kcal
Highest protein
Classic (Bone-In) Wings, Atomic
10 g protein
Lowest carbs
Classic (Bone-In) Wings, Atomic
1 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Classic (Bone-In) Wings, Atomic
220 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classic (Bone-In) Wings, AtomicClassic (Bone-In) Wings | 90 kcal | 10 g | 1 g | 5 g | 0 g | 220 mg |
| Boneless Tenders, AtomicBoneless Tenders | 150 kcal | 10 g | 12 g | 7 g | 0 g | 850 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Classic (Bone-In) Wings, Atomic if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 90 calories per serving.
Choose Classic (Bone-In) Wings, Atomic if you want the most protein. It has 10g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Classic (Bone-In) Wings, Atomic is the lighter sodium pick at 220mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Wingstop calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator