NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Buffalo Chicken & Jack, Small vs Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, Medium
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Deli Delicious menu items.
Quick answer
Buffalo Chicken & Jack, Small is lowest in calories, while Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, Medium gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Buffalo Chicken & Jack, Small
770 kcal
Highest protein
Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, Medium
51 g protein
Lowest carbs
Buffalo Chicken & Jack, Small
74 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, Medium
1,750 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buffalo Chicken & Jack, SmallHot Sandwiches | 770 kcal | 50 g | 74 g | 31 g | 11 g | 1,790 mg |
| Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, MediumSpecialty Sandwiches | 1,140 kcal | 51 g | 93 g | 67 g | 14 g | 1,750 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Buffalo Chicken & Jack, Small if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 770 calories per serving.
Choose Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, Medium if you want the most protein. It has 51g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, Medium is the lighter sodium pick at 1,750mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Deli Delicious calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator