NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Chicken, Bacon & Jack, Small vs Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, Large
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Deli Delicious menu items.
Quick answer
Chicken, Bacon & Jack, Small is lowest in calories, while Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, Large gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Chicken, Bacon & Jack, Small
800 kcal
Highest protein
Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, Large
79 g protein
Lowest carbs
Chicken, Bacon & Jack, Small
74 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Chicken, Bacon & Jack, Small
1,510 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicken, Bacon & Jack, SmallHot Sandwiches | 800 kcal | 52 g | 74 g | 34 g | 11 g | 1,510 mg |
| Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, LargeSpecialty Sandwiches | 1,770 kcal | 79 g | 151 g | 101 g | 23 g | 2,680 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Chicken, Bacon & Jack, Small if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 800 calories per serving.
Choose Albacore White Tuna & Swiss, Large if you want the most protein. It has 79g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Chicken, Bacon & Jack, Small is the lighter sodium pick at 1,510mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Deli Delicious calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator