NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Path to Tibet vs A nut from Ipanema
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Go Bites menu items.
Quick answer
Path to Tibet is the strongest overall pick here: lower calories and the most protein among these items.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Path to Tibet
227 kcal
Highest protein
Path to Tibet
7.8 g protein
Lowest carbs
A nut from Ipanema
18.3 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Path to Tibet
9.9 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Path to TibetSnack | 227 kcal | 7.8 g | 23.2 g | 12.9 g | 5.4 g | 10 mg |
| A nut from IpanemaSnack | 236 kcal | 5.6 g | 18.3 g | 15.7 g | 3.5 g | 38 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Path to Tibet if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 227 calories per serving.
Choose Path to Tibet if you want the most protein. It has 7.8g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Path to Tibet is the lighter sodium pick at 10mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Go Bites calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator