NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Crispy Chicken Tenders (turbo chef), Vegan Ranch Dressing vs "Not So Fried" Chicken, Half
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Mendocino Farms menu items.
Quick answer
Crispy Chicken Tenders (turbo chef), Vegan Ranch Dressing is lowest in calories, while "Not So Fried" Chicken, Half gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Crispy Chicken Tenders (turbo chef), Vegan Ranch Dressing
120 kcal
Highest protein
"Not So Fried" Chicken, Half
17 g protein
Lowest carbs
Crispy Chicken Tenders (turbo chef), Vegan Ranch Dressing
0.5 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Crispy Chicken Tenders (turbo chef), Vegan Ranch Dressing
120 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crispy Chicken Tenders (turbo chef), Vegan Ranch DressingKids Meals | 120 kcal | 0 g | 0.5 g | 13 g | 0 g | 120 mg |
| "Not So Fried" Chicken, HalfHalf Sandwich Combos | 450 kcal | 17 g | 39 g | 24 g | 3 g | 670 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Crispy Chicken Tenders (turbo chef), Vegan Ranch Dressing if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 120 calories per serving.
Choose "Not So Fried" Chicken, Half if you want the most protein. It has 17g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Crispy Chicken Tenders (turbo chef), Vegan Ranch Dressing is the lighter sodium pick at 120mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Mendocino Farms calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator