NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Thai Almond Dressing vs "Not So Fried" Chicken, Half
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Mendocino Farms menu items.
Quick answer
Thai Almond Dressing is lowest in calories, while "Not So Fried" Chicken, Half gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Thai Almond Dressing
200 kcal
Highest protein
"Not So Fried" Chicken, Half
17 g protein
Lowest carbs
Thai Almond Dressing
15 g carbs
Lowest sodium
"Not So Fried" Chicken, Half
670 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thai Almond DressingDressings & Sauces | 200 kcal | 1 g | 15 g | 16 g | 0.5 g | 750 mg |
| "Not So Fried" Chicken, HalfHalf Sandwich Combos | 450 kcal | 17 g | 39 g | 24 g | 3 g | 670 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Thai Almond Dressing if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 200 calories per serving.
Choose "Not So Fried" Chicken, Half if you want the most protein. It has 17g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, "Not So Fried" Chicken, Half is the lighter sodium pick at 670mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Mendocino Farms calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator