NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Nanoosh Wrap vs BabaNanoosh
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Nanoosh menu items.
Quick answer
BabaNanoosh is lowest in calories, while Nanoosh Wrap gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
BabaNanoosh
159 kcal
Highest protein
Nanoosh Wrap
30 g protein
Lowest carbs
BabaNanoosh
12 g carbs
Lowest sodium
BabaNanoosh
375 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanoosh WrapWraps | 608 kcal | 30 g | 64 g | 29 g | 9 g | 923 mg |
| BabaNanooshSides | 159 kcal | 4 g | 12 g | 11 g | 2 g | 375 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose BabaNanoosh if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 159 calories per serving.
Choose Nanoosh Wrap if you want the most protein. It has 30g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, BabaNanoosh is the lighter sodium pick at 375mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Nanoosh calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator