NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Balsamic Grilled Chicken, No Sides vs All Star Burger, No Side
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Ninety Nine Restaurants menu items.
Quick answer
Balsamic Grilled Chicken, No Sides is lowest in calories, while All Star Burger, No Side gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Balsamic Grilled Chicken, No Sides
460 kcal
Highest protein
All Star Burger, No Side
56 g protein
Lowest carbs
Balsamic Grilled Chicken, No Sides
30 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Balsamic Grilled Chicken, No Sides
1,300 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balsamic Grilled Chicken, No SidesChicken & Turkey | 460 kcal | 46 g | 30 g | 16 g | 0 g | 1,300 mg |
| All Star Burger, No SideJuicy Burgers | 1,170 kcal | 56 g | 81 g | 68 g | 3 g | 3,170 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Balsamic Grilled Chicken, No Sides if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 460 calories per serving.
Choose All Star Burger, No Side if you want the most protein. It has 56g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Balsamic Grilled Chicken, No Sides is the lighter sodium pick at 1,300mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Ninety Nine Restaurants calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator