NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Lunch, Lasagna Classico vs 6 oz. Sirloin
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Olive Garden menu items.
Quick answer
Lunch, Lasagna Classico is lowest in calories, while 6 oz. Sirloin gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Lunch, Lasagna Classico
500 kcal
Highest protein
6 oz. Sirloin
57 g protein
Lowest carbs
Lunch, Lasagna Classico
33 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Lunch, Lasagna Classico
1,290 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lunch, Lasagna ClassicoLunch-Sized Favorites | 500 kcal | 29 g | 33 g | 30 g | 3 g | 1,290 mg |
| 6 oz. SirloinDinner Entrees | 980 kcal | 57 g | 49 g | 62 g | 2 g | 1,840 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Lunch, Lasagna Classico if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 500 calories per serving.
Choose 6 oz. Sirloin if you want the most protein. It has 57g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Lunch, Lasagna Classico is the lighter sodium pick at 1,290mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Olive Garden calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator