NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Carpaccio vs 50/50 Sazerac
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Ruth's Chris Steak House menu items.
Quick answer
50/50 Sazerac is lowest in calories, while Carpaccio gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
50/50 Sazerac
140 kcal
Highest protein
Carpaccio
26 g protein
Lowest carbs
50/50 Sazerac
13 g carbs
Lowest sodium
50/50 Sazerac
0 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CarpaccioRegional Appetizers | 710 kcal | 26 g | 38 g | 50 g | 3 g | 1,060 mg |
| 50/50 SazeracHand-Crafted Cocktails | 140 kcal | 0 g | 13 g | 0 g | 0 g | 0 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose 50/50 Sazerac if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 140 calories per serving.
Choose Carpaccio if you want the most protein. It has 26g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, 50/50 Sazerac is the lighter sodium pick at 0mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Ruth's Chris Steak House calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator