NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Royal English Breakfast Tea Latte with Nonfat Milk, Short vs 2% Milk, Tall
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Starbucks menu items.
Quick answer
Royal English Breakfast Tea Latte with Nonfat Milk, Short is lowest in calories, while 2% Milk, Tall gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Royal English Breakfast Tea Latte with Nonfat Milk, Short
60 kcal
Highest protein
2% Milk, Tall
13 g protein
Lowest carbs
Royal English Breakfast Tea Latte with Nonfat Milk, Short
11 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Royal English Breakfast Tea Latte with Nonfat Milk, Short
50 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royal English Breakfast Tea Latte with Nonfat Milk, ShortTea Beverages | 60 kcal | 4 g | 11 g | 0 g | 0 g | 50 mg |
| 2% Milk, TallOther Beverages | 200 kcal | 13 g | 19 g | 8 g | 0 g | 190 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Royal English Breakfast Tea Latte with Nonfat Milk, Short if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 60 calories per serving.
Choose 2% Milk, Tall if you want the most protein. It has 13g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Royal English Breakfast Tea Latte with Nonfat Milk, Short is the lighter sodium pick at 50mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Starbucks calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator