NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Reuben Grinder vs Baked Chicken Grinder
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Wg Grinders menu items.
Quick answer
Reuben Grinder is lowest in calories, while Baked Chicken Grinder gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Reuben Grinder
220 kcal
Highest protein
Baked Chicken Grinder
19 g protein
Lowest carbs
Baked Chicken Grinder
42 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Baked Chicken Grinder
620 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reuben Grinder6” Beef Grinders | 220 kcal | 12 g | 44 g | 1.5 g | 8 g | 1,380 mg |
| Baked Chicken Grinder6” Chicken Grinders | 250 kcal | 19 g | 42 g | 2 g | 2 g | 620 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Reuben Grinder if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 220 calories per serving.
Choose Baked Chicken Grinder if you want the most protein. It has 19g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Baked Chicken Grinder is the lighter sodium pick at 620mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Wg Grinders calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator