NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Reuben Grinder vs BLT Grinder
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Wg Grinders menu items.
Quick answer
Reuben Grinder is lowest in calories, while BLT Grinder gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Reuben Grinder
220 kcal
Highest protein
BLT Grinder
21 g protein
Lowest carbs
Reuben Grinder
44 g carbs
Lowest sodium
BLT Grinder
1,020 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reuben Grinder6” Beef Grinders | 220 kcal | 12 g | 44 g | 1.5 g | 8 g | 1,380 mg |
| BLT Grinder6” Specialty Grinders | 410 kcal | 21 g | 60 g | 13 g | 3 g | 1,020 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Reuben Grinder if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 220 calories per serving.
Choose BLT Grinder if you want the most protein. It has 21g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, BLT Grinder is the lighter sodium pick at 1,020mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Wg Grinders calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator