NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Sirloin Steak Grinder vs BLT Grinder
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Wg Grinders menu items.
Quick answer
BLT Grinder is lowest in calories, while Sirloin Steak Grinder gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
BLT Grinder
410 kcal
Highest protein
Sirloin Steak Grinder
35 g protein
Lowest carbs
BLT Grinder
60 g carbs
Lowest sodium
BLT Grinder
1,020 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sirloin Steak Grinder6” Beef Grinders | 430 kcal | 35 g | 64 g | 4.5 g | 3 g | 1,080 mg |
| BLT Grinder6” Specialty Grinders | 410 kcal | 21 g | 60 g | 13 g | 3 g | 1,020 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose BLT Grinder if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 410 calories per serving.
Choose Sirloin Steak Grinder if you want the most protein. It has 35g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, BLT Grinder is the lighter sodium pick at 1,020mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Wg Grinders calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator