NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Boneless Tenders, Old Bay vs Boneless Tenders, Atomic
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Wingstop menu items.
Quick answer
Boneless Tenders, Atomic is lowest in calories, while Boneless Tenders, Old Bay gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Boneless Tenders, Atomic
150 kcal
Highest protein
Boneless Tenders, Old Bay
10 g protein
Lowest carbs
Boneless Tenders, Old Bay
10 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Boneless Tenders, Old Bay
420 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boneless Tenders, Old BayBoneless Tenders | 170 kcal | 10 g | 10 g | 11 g | 0 g | 420 mg |
| Boneless Tenders, AtomicBoneless Tenders | 150 kcal | 10 g | 12 g | 7 g | 0 g | 850 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Boneless Tenders, Atomic if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 150 calories per serving.
Choose Boneless Tenders, Old Bay if you want the most protein. It has 10g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Boneless Tenders, Old Bay is the lighter sodium pick at 420mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Wingstop calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator