NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Chicago Grinder vs BLT Grinder
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Bellacino's Pizza & Grinders menu items.
Quick answer
Chicago Grinder is lowest in calories, while BLT Grinder gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Chicago Grinder
813 kcal
Highest protein
BLT Grinder
45.8 g protein
Lowest carbs
BLT Grinder
67.2 g carbs
Lowest sodium
BLT Grinder
2,350.9 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago GrinderGrinders | 813 kcal | 42.9 g | 72.1 g | 38.3 g | 3.4 g | 2,703 mg |
| BLT GrinderGrinders | 1,024 kcal | 45.8 g | 67.2 g | 58.9 g | 3.8 g | 2,351 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Chicago Grinder if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 813 calories per serving.
Choose BLT Grinder if you want the most protein. It has 45.8g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, BLT Grinder is the lighter sodium pick at 2,351mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Bellacino's Pizza & Grinders calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator