NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Pan-Grilled Pork Chops vs Baked Alaskan White Fish
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Furr's Family Dining menu items.
Quick answer
Pan-Grilled Pork Chops is lowest in calories, while Baked Alaskan White Fish gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Pan-Grilled Pork Chops
447 kcal
Highest protein
Baked Alaskan White Fish
33.5 g protein
Lowest carbs
Pan-Grilled Pork Chops
14.9 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Pan-Grilled Pork Chops
687 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pan-Grilled Pork ChopsENTREES | 447 kcal | 23.1 g | 14.9 g | 31.4 g | 0.6 g | 687 mg |
| Baked Alaskan White FishENTREES | 493 kcal | 33.5 g | 24.2 g | 29.5 g | 1.2 g | 850 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Pan-Grilled Pork Chops if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 447 calories per serving.
Choose Baked Alaskan White Fish if you want the most protein. It has 33.5g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Pan-Grilled Pork Chops is the lighter sodium pick at 687mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Furr's Family Dining calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator