NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Chicken, Sticks & Rings vs 12 oz. Grilled Asparagus Bearnaise
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Ground Round menu items.
Quick answer
Chicken, Sticks & Rings is lowest in calories, while 12 oz. Grilled Asparagus Bearnaise gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Chicken, Sticks & Rings
890 kcal
Highest protein
12 oz. Grilled Asparagus Bearnaise
64 g protein
Lowest carbs
12 oz. Grilled Asparagus Bearnaise
18 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Chicken, Sticks & Rings
2,320 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicken, Sticks & RingsAppetizers | 890 kcal | 50 g | 79 g | 44 g | 4 g | 2,320 mg |
| 12 oz. Grilled Asparagus BearnaiseSteak | 900 kcal | 64 g | 18 g | 59 g | 1 g | 2,540 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Chicken, Sticks & Rings if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 890 calories per serving.
Choose 12 oz. Grilled Asparagus Bearnaise if you want the most protein. It has 64g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Chicken, Sticks & Rings is the lighter sodium pick at 2,320mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Ground Round calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator