NutrimetryRestaurant nutrition made simple.
☰×Toggle navigation
Nutrition comparison
Baby Back Ribs, Full Rack vs 1 1/2 Rack Baby Back Dinner
Compare calories, protein, carbs, fat, sodium, and fiber for these Rib City menu items.
Quick answer
Baby Back Ribs, Full Rack is lowest in calories, while 1 1/2 Rack Baby Back Dinner gives the most protein.
Add all to calculatorLowest calories
Baby Back Ribs, Full Rack
600 kcal
Highest protein
1 1/2 Rack Baby Back Dinner
55 g protein
Lowest carbs
Baby Back Ribs, Full Rack
4 g carbs
Lowest sodium
Baby Back Ribs, Full Rack
600 mg sodium
Side-by-side nutrition facts
Values are per listed serving and may vary by location or preparation.
| Menu item | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baby Back Ribs, Full RackA La Carte | 600 kcal | 36 g | 4 g | 51 g | 0 g | 600 mg |
| 1 1/2 Rack Baby Back DinnerDinners | 910 kcal | 55 g | 6 g | 77 g | 0 g | 890 mg |
Which should you choose?
Choose Baby Back Ribs, Full Rack if your priority is keeping calories lower. It has 600 calories per serving.
Choose 1 1/2 Rack Baby Back Dinner if you want the most protein. It has 55g protein per serving.
If sodium matters, Baby Back Ribs, Full Rack is the lighter sodium pick at 600mg.
Compare as a meal
Open these items in the Rib City calculator to see combined calories and macros.
Open calculator